B. Gadamauri
To Win
TBD
To Win
Buvaysar Gadamauri vs Toby Samuel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L W W W L
Form
L W L W W W W L L LHead To Head: Gadamauri 1 - 0 Samuel
They have played 3 sets in total, with Gadamauri winning 2 and Samuel winning 1. The last match between Gadamauri and Samuel was at the M25 Bath, 12-01-2022, First, I.hard with Buvaysar Gadamauri getting the victory 3-6 6-2 7-6(3).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Buvaysar Gadamauri | 1 |
| Toby Samuel | 0 |
M25 Bath(12-01-2022)
3
6
6
2
7
6
| Gadamauri | Stats | Samuel |
|---|---|---|
| 63% (10-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 56% (9-7) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 685 | Ranking | 888 |
| 515 | Highest Rank | 404 |
| 24 | Age | 22 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 4 |
| 58% (216-154) | Career Total W/L | 67% (55-27) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $36,000 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
Gadamauri VS TBD
- / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Maneiro VS Frech PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Agut VS Clar PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-2 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Toby Samuel
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
86
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 14 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:59:0 | Average Match Time | 1:59:0 |
| 67% (56/84) | 1st Serve % | 70% (58/83) |
| 68% (38/56) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (37/58) |
| 50% (14/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (12/25) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (4/9) |
| 41% (34/83) | Return Points Win % | 38% (32/84) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Buvaysar Gadamauri Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF | 6-7(4) 6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| SF | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-7(6) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 3-6 7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 4-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Tadeas Paroulek
Player
Buvaysar Gadamauri
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
78)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Thomas Deschamps
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve %
77%
(
46 of
60)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Toby Samuel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Toby Samuel
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
62%
(
52 of
84)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
80
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 1-6 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aziz Dougaz
Player
Toby Samuel
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
9
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
15 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Steven Diez
Player
Toby Samuel
53%
(
46 of
87)
1st Serve %
75%
(
55 of
73)
0
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
50%
(
23 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
48%
(
42 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
82
Total Points Won
78
|
5-7 6-4 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Toby Samuel
Player
Nico Hipfl
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Christoph Negritu
Player
Toby Samuel
69%
(
91 of
132)
1st Serve %
61%
(
74 of
122)
19
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
66 of
91)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
52 of
74)
37%
(
15 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
51 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
46 of
122)
127
Total Points Won
127
|
7-6(6) 6-7(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Toby Samuel
Player
Michael Agwi
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
8
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Toby Samuel
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
71%
(
59 of
83)
3
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
23 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (216/154) | Win/Loss | 67% (55/27) |
| 57% (476/360) | Sets Win/Loss | 66% (124/63) |
| 53% (4151/3673) | Games Win/Loss | 56% (1014/783) |
| 62% (62/38) | Hard Win/Loss | 72% (23/9) |
| 58% (129/95) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (25/21) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (18/12) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 70% (14/6) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.42 |
| 515 | Aces Total | 367 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 607 | Total Double Faults | 180 |
| 1:4:44 | Average Match Time | 1:33:50 |
| 386.82 | Average Opponent Rank | 462.43 |
| 64% (10111/15786) | 1st Serve % | 65% (3567/5486) |
| 65% (6566/10111) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (2533/3567) |
| 50% (2829/5675) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (987/1919) |
| 43% (722/1675) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (255/576) |
| 41% (6562/15914) | Return Points Win % | 41% (2267/5524) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (10/10) | Challenger W/L | 33% (5/10) |
| 59% (206/144) | Futures W/L | 75% (49/16) |
| 58% (208/361) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 69% (55/80) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 55% (42/76) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (14/26) |
| 51% (51/100) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (9/21) |
| 89% (207/185) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (60/52) |
| 10% (207/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (60/8) |
| 18% (163/30) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (22/3) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
